Monday, November 28, 2011

Seattle NABC

While many people are just getting into the swing of things at the fall NABC I am on my way back home after 3+ days there. Richard Popper and I started with a good session in the Nail LM Pairs and ended with a great session in the consolation (regional A/X pairs). Unfortunately the two middle sessions were pretty terrible, on both our parts as well as luck. Additionally I scratched with my dad in 2 side games. Strangely, in this my 16th NABC, it is the first one in which I played in no midnight games. Drinking with Mikey and Alli won out one night and kibitzing/wandering around aimlessly won out the other night.

My favorite part of the tournament was certainly our round against Curtis Cheek and Lynn Deas in the LM pairs. We collected 47 out of 50 matchpoints against them. Here is first deal against them (board 9 Friday afternoon):

x
JT9x
Axxx
AKxx

AQx
Qx
KQJx
xxxx
 
I opened 1D and wound up in 3NT after Curtis on my left overcalled 1S and was raised. He led away from the SK at trick 1, which gives me trick #8. Trick 9 would have to come from either clubs or hearts. At first it seems that I would have to rely on clubs splitting 3-2 since there isn't adequate time to set up a heart. However, I ran diamonds immediately to see if there would be any interesting discards. Sure enough, Curtis ditched a heart and a spade.

This allowed me to be able to set up a heart trick and lose only 2 spades abs 2 hearts, assuming spades were originally 5-4 as had been indicated. A club pitch from his initial holding of QJxx would have allowed me to set up a 3rd trick easily but had he pitched both of his hearts, I probably would have gone down as relying on a good club split would be the only reasonable option.
 
Popper and I ran into a couple of situations where we were not on the same page on auctions that cost us dearly. 1NT-2C-X-3C; 3D-P-3H sounds like Smolen to me, and the continuation P-3NT-P-4S sounds like responder is 6-4. Of course, I could have just bid 4S over 3D as that cannot be misinterpreted - it could just wrong side the contract. 1S-P-2S-X; 4S-4NT-P-5D; P. Is this a forcing pass situation? I think so but I suppose there is a good argument for it being not forcing since 4S could be based on a more preemptive hand with playing strength but not much defense.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Unexpectedly passing partner's mostly forcing bid

I've had several opportunities in the last few days to pass partner unexpectedly. Last night at the club, my partner twice intervened over a 1NT opening. In the first instance, I held QJxxx  A9xx  KTxx  - and after 1NT-P-P, partner doubled, which for us showed 1 suited with clubs or diamonds and a major. I have a decent hand and partner is almost sure to have clubs so I converted to penalty. We were only able to set it 1 because partner couldn't find the difficult shift of a diamond at trick 2 and I would up being endplayed into leading a heart to dummy's good but otherwise unaccessible Q or lead into declarer's AQ.
 
The second instance of this occurred when partner overcalled 2 over my LHO's 1NT, which shows diamonds or a major-minor two suiter. This time I held Tx  xxx  x  QJTxxxx so I happily passed and let partner play the 7-1 fit.
 
The most interesting of these was Sunday in the Swiss teams in Spartanburg. I held x  AT9xxx  -  98xxxx and the auction was 1-2-P to me. I really did want to pass this and I think I probably should as bidding anything could easily get us in trouble and get us in a doubled contract. This time I was optimistic so I bid 3, natural. P bid 3 and I tried 4, which got raised to 5. All in all, this was a better contract than 2 (we did in fact get to our only 8 card fit) but were just a little too high. P had a rock: KTxxx  -  AKQJxx  AQ.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Spoil the Squeeze but give up the same trick in the process

My hand of the tournament from the recent Roswell sectional this past weekend is this cute hand where I was all set to squeeze RHO in the black suits until Michael White made it easy for me by leading the J.
 
Dealer: N
Vul: NS
North
Qxxx
Q
AJx
KTxxx
South
A
KJx
KQxxxx
A9x
 
North
East
South
West
1
Pass
1
2
Pass
Pass
3NT
Pass
Pass
Pass
After winning the heart lead in dummy, I crossed to my hand with a diamond and played another heart, already planning to attempt to squeeze RHO in the blacks. With the 1 heart loser and 11 sure winners, I would be able to arrange to score up a 12th trick in a black suit if RHO started with K and 3 clubs. This is what the 4 card ending would be like with the last diamond to be played from my hand:
Dealer: E
Vul: EW
North
Qx
Kx
West
x
x
Jx
East
K
Qxx
South
x
A9x
West ditched a heart on the last diamond, dummy a small spade, and east could not protect both spades and clubs so my 9 would score the last trick.
 
In reality, Michael White shifted to the J after he took the A, thereby breaking up the squeeze because I needed both club entries for the squeeze because the 2 threat cards (Q and 9) are in different hands. However, in doing so, he allowed me to make the extra trick by simply taking the K and finessing for the Q. I wasn't happy because I didn't get to execute the squeeze, RHO wasn't happy because he thought Michael had made the only lead that let me make an extra trick, but Michael knew I was making 6 anyway and that 6 would make so he wasn't unhappy.