Showing posts with label gambling 3NT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gambling 3NT. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2011

Gambling 3NT and jumps to slam

Playing with Sean Gannon in the second round of the A/X Swiss yesterday, the auction started:

Andre
North
Sean
South
--
Pass
3NT
Pass
6
6

Sean and I play the a 3NT opening opposite an unpassed hand shows a solid 7 card minor with at most 1 ace or king outside the suit. Over 6, Sean asked: "Do you have any agreement about this 6 bid?"
South: "..umm.."
Sean: "Well, if you have talked about this auction, you can have all the imps."

Dealer: N
Vul: EW
North
KTxxx
KTxxxx
-
xx
Andre
Qxxx
A
AKQTxxx
J
Sean
Jx
-
Jxxx
AKQT9xx
South
Ax
QJxxxx
xx
xxx

Sean bid 7, confident that I held both pointed aces with one of those suits probably running, and that was passed out! The defense could have taken the first 2 tricks in spades but got off to the wrong lead. Our teammates Alli Howard and Lee Bukstel reached a fairly normal 6X, down 2, so we won 18 imps instead of losing 11.

Anyway, Sean and I now have the agreement that if we pass 6 in this or a similar auction, we are showing first round control of their suit, sort of inviting partner to bid 7 and if we double, we deny first round control.

We wound up winning flight X with 146 VP on a 120 average.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Unusual Penalty Doubles

These deals from last weekend in Wilmington, all involving strange penalty doubles, were rather amusing and contributed a lot to our winning.

Sean and I play a Gambling-like 3NT opening. It always shows a solid 7 card minor but in first and second seat it could contain 2 outside controls and possibly even more in 3rd seat. Friday night Sean dealt and held: ♠JTx, T9xxxx, Txx, ♣x. The auction went: P-P-3NT-4; P-4-X-P; P-P. It's hard to imagine how I could have a double but even with this crappy hand, leaving the double in when they're bid his 6 card suit was no problem. I held 7 solid clubs, plus the ♠A and KJ so I just wanted to let him know I do have some defense and he can do something smart. We only beat it 2 but it was good for almost all of the matchpoints.

Saturday afternoon, Sean held another beauty: ♠97, T97, 7632, ♣Q765. The auction, with me as dealer: 1♣-P-1-P; 1-P-1♠-X; XX-P-P-P. Here's a quick lesson on part of our Swedish canapé system.
1♣ was either a weak NT or any 17+.
1was any 0-7 or 12+ w/o a 4 card major.
1 was 18-20 bal or 23+ bal or 17+ 4+ unbalanced and possibly canapé.
1♠ was any 0-5. Redouble was undiscussed and I am glad we were both on the same page in thinking that it's a business redouble. I had a 24-count that's canapé with longer spades: ♠AKQ43, AKQ4, Q8, ♣A8. We were probably getting to 3NT or 4♠ going down. Good thing she made a lead-directing double on her T8652 suit with 2 jacks outside. In case you were wondering, 1♠ redoubled making 2 is 1120.

Saturday night, I made yet another penalty double and Sean had a crappy hand. This time my LHO dealt and Sean held ♠QJ4,
T5, QT83, ♣AT53. Our auction: P-P-1-P; P-X-1♠-X; 2-P-P-X; P-P-P. Since we do not play strong NT overcalls (1NT would be takeout showing 4 spades and a 5 card minor), he is aware that I may well have a strong NT but just have no bid. Therefore, balancing on lighter values is probably a good idea, but in this case, he has a decent balancing double at the one level by a passed hand whatever your system. As it turns out, all I had was a 4-3-3-3 hand with A-AK-K and 3 small hearts and would have never doubled 2 if the opponents were not vulnerable in matchpoints. With trump leads at every opportunity, we prevented a diamond ruff in dummy and set it one for +200 and a top. The rest of the scores on that board were pretty evenly divided between +100 and +130.

Feel free to check one of the boxes below each post to let us know whether you think it's funny, interesting, boring, impressive, or depressing. And I highly recommend clicking some of the links, especially in the section Highly Recommended Articles.