Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Bidding with a solid minor

IMPs, EW vul, north deals.

xxx
xx
Ax
AKQJxx

QJ
Qxxxx
KJxxx
T

1C-1S-X-1NT
X-2S-X-P
3C-P-3D-P
3S-X-P-P
4C-P-4H-P
5C-X-P-P
P

There are several questionable calls in this auction, and it is
unclear which if any of the bids are forcing. Which calls do you most
disagree with?

I think the 2nd and 3rd doubles are clearly worst. After that, we each
thought the other person had a stronger hand than he actually had and
we got a bit carried away.

On another, somewhat related topic, 1m-1M-3NT does not show a balanced
hand of any strength - they're all covered by other bids. It shows a
long running suit with stoppers in the unbid suit. This is standard, I
think.

3 comments:

  1. I understand the second double, but not the third.

    It shows a long running suit with stoppers in the unbid suit. This is standard, I think.

    Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Looking at South's hand, the intention of the third double seemed to bid "bid a red suit." I think that it should basically show strength (more than south actually had) and ask partner to do something intelligent. I think that the three club bid was appropriate to either meaning of the double, and I think that the three diamond bid was injudicious.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "seemed to be", not "seemed to bid."

    ReplyDelete